Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 05:19
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
'There's a huge amount that we don't understand': Why sperm is still so mysterious - BBC
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What we know about Trump's latest travel ban - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Have you ever been forced to undress for money just once?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Quantum embezzlement is hiding in known one-dimensional materials: Study - Interesting Engineering
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.